WEEK 6I went to Germany this past weekend (Sat. 21.02.09) with a friend who's also in Vienna, and we had a blast!! She wanted to check out the Fasching celebrations (comparable to a Mardi Gras parade) in Munich; she had not yet been to Germany, so we hopped on the train and behold! we were there in a little under four hours. It was great to be back to what I call my "hometown in a past life." We also saw quite a few musicians performing in the main square, and one in particular was absolutely fantastic because he was both a musician and a comedian. I took a video with my camera, which is posted here for you. Please excuse the my hysterical laughing and awful camera techniques, but this guy was insanely awesome. Here we go:
WEEK 7
The following excerpts are from an assignment for my critical thinking class. In this assignment, we were asked to examine the elements of knowledge, belief, faith, and opinion. Somehow they are different from one another, but how? My thoughts on knowledge and opinion that are written here are also applicable to other recent events/thoughts this week. Time to bust out a bit of philosophy here ... just bear with me a little longer - if you haven't thought of these things like this before, I promise! it's interesting :o)
Q1 What are the necessary conditions for something to be considered knowledge?
A1 The concept of knowledge is rather hard to define. Knowledge surely encompasses the study of the past, of history. In this regard, however, knowledge not only includes knowing the historical events themselves [the Magna Carta was written in 1215] but also the motives behind such events [the Magna Carta was drafted in order to set some limits on the authority of the king]. Knowledge also requires also a certainty in the speaker's mind. It would make no sense for me to say "I know" to something that I don't have certainty about. I'd say "I think that ... " or "I've heard this..." instead. Knowledge is unbiased (although what we know about certain things can and does change.) Something happened. We are aware that it happened. Simple as that. Whether the event was or is deemed good or bad by so-and-so is not significant. The specifics of knowledge can become less clear as time lengthens between the event and our awareness of that event; the transfer of ideas is subject to the "lens" of the transporter, just as water collects different minerals, gasses, and particles on its way from the sky to the rockbeds.
It is widely accepted that "knowledge is power." Therefore because knowledge is the awareness of things, this awareness allows one the choice of action or application of that awareness in the present state of affairs.
The absense of knowledge, or ignorance, is therefore the absense of the same things knowledge "guarantees." If we don't know, action or application cannot be possible. This is only theory. There is, however, rarely an absense of knowledge. If you know one thing, but do not know another, it should not be considered ignorance. When someone says, "I know..." it typically implies: "I am aware of --" or "I am able to do --" This usage fits what I consider the purpose of knowledge: to offer choices in action or application. Take this example: I know how to ride I bicycle, but I do not know how to drive a car. I know how to get around the city, but the options I have - the roads I take, distance, weather conditions, load, etc. - will vary depending on if I know how to ride a bike or drive a car.
Q2 What are the conditions for something to be considered opinion?
A2 Opinions are categorized viewpoints (or better, judgements) concerning knowledge. For almost each passing of evnts there exists many theories which are in favor/not in favor of the event. Opinions seem to look at alternatives to what has occured, and more specifically, alternatives to other opinions. Opinions are often not as personal as beliefs are, and in everyday speech this is made clear. "I am of the opinion that --" or "That's just my opinion --" suggests that the opinions are already out there, "lined up in a row," and I have simply chosen one, and as more opinions become more available, I am open to choosing another one.
Believe it or not, this assignment has caused me to look very carefully at how I think, learn about, and react to events around me...
_____
Studying and living in a city is, as I mentioned a few weeks ago, not at all an easy endeavor. One of the hardest things about such an experience is the knowledge that I have and acquire. Because the environment is new, I observe each event with a special keeness, noticing every detail, in an effort to acquire more knowledge about my surroundings. I observe and recall everything - people's behavior, the topics in the newspapers, the advertisements, the layout of the city, the ideas brought forth by classmates - with an extraordinarily specific accuracy that I didn't even know existed! However, such keen observation can be discouraging. Because I do not observe and remember this culture with the specificity that I observe and remember culture in St. Louis, there is nothing for which I can readily find an equivolant. The most pressing examples that has been on my mind this week are: first, a great frustration and gripping sadness with the current state of the world; and second, a search for the delicate balance between "imitation on the assumption that that is accepted" and still holding out "resistance to being 'the status quo'"I will talk about these two in more detail very soon.
[Photos: 1. little shops radiate their lights under the arches of the cathedral at Marienplatz (Munich) 2. my street on a snowy night in Vienna]






